I've been asked what I think of the new Bonnie
& Clyde TV movie. To my educated Bonnie & Clyde mind-- a real
mishmosh of fantasy, 1/2 truth, some truth, mixing of truths and wishful
thinking. "However"-- as so little is known of the famous duo's
personal interaction behind known Bonnie & Clyde historical events,
it seems the screenwriters here have taken full advantage of those
unknowns. As such, Bonnie is portrayed as the young mastermind of her
own star-filled dreams-- as transferred to seeking fame within a crime
duo instead of as a rejected Hollywood wannabe and dancer. BTW-- in real
life, according to her sister Billie-- Bonnie aspired to being a singer
on Broadway.
Now was the real Bonnie Parker as conniving and aggressive as her TV counterpart?? Despite some wanting to believe she was the ultimate sweetheart-- eyewitness accounts had her cursing like a sailor, being threatening, drinking to excess, resorting to powerful pain-killing drugs (after being seriously injured at Wellington), and without much doubt-- having fired weapons at the law on a number of occasions. That said-- perhaps her portrayal here isn't that far from the truth. Now whether the real Bonnie ever had an inkling to settle for fame as a criminal within a gang responsible for at least 12 killings, rather than as a performer-- I don't believe can be discerned based on what is known of the real lady.
Certainly, Bonnie (who was known to be quite intelligent)-- knew that once she and the boys were sought for murder-- most any aspirations she had of a legitimate career in show business were through. So this movie hits on an aspect of Bonnie rarely considered. Bonnie "was" though-- surely stubborn, and loyal to her man to the end. And in this version sexually promiscuous, just as rumored after her death. However, in having dealt with Bonnie & Clyde sexual rumors for years now-- my feeling is, when someone shows me concrete evidence to back claims which eclipse the dealings of a normal sexually active young couple-- I'll consider it. Until then-- objectively, claims of nymphomania in Bonnie and homosexuality in Clyde seem unfounded. However years later, Dr. James Wade revealed that when killed-- both Bonnie & Clyde had had gonorrhea. So "go figure" the possibilities.
Some may be surprised to hear me say, that despite my being a Bonnie & Clyde purist-- and despite my choosing not to even attempt a count of historical inaccuracies this new Bonnie & Clyde film presents-- I must admit to liking this fantasized version to a certain degree, for the "entertainment" it is. I must say a truly different twist on Bonnie & Clyde-- much fun but historically inept. The casting for the most part is strong. Both the Clyde and Bonnie actors (as they "were" mostly known at the time)-- are terrific. And I especially like the Emma Parker, Cumie Barrow and Henry Barrow portrayals. I will say though, in knowing L. J. "Boots" Hinton as I do-- I wouldn't want to be in the room, when someone tells him his father Ted is seen coming on to Bonnie in asking for a kiss. But in all fairness, there are rumors concerning Ted's attraction to Bonnie-- some of which Ted caused himself. But that too you see-- is one of this history's many unknowns.
The conspicuous absence of W. D. Jones, materially changed a number of B&C occurrences. The mixed up way events were combined and placed out of order, is surely perplexing to those of us who know the correct order of things. For example, I didn't know Frank Hamer was hot on their trail at Dexter, Iowa and made the fatal shot which felled Buck months before the Eastham breakout. Now "that's" some creative combining of characters and events!! Nothing like pressing so much wrong into so little space. I do give the writers credit for knowing of Bonnie's use of Amytal. If they had only added Morphine to the mix, they would've had a much different Bonnie prior to Eastham. BTW-- Clyde was thought to have an effective "6th sense" which kept them out of trouble. It was Bonnie who had premonitions, as she did concerning the deaths of Billie's children.
And no matter the B&C version-- it must be really hard to find an actress who looks roughly like Bonnie and is the same size. The Clyde Barrow portrayal here seems right, as Clyde was 5' 6". Bonnie on the other hand, was a diminutive woman-- just under 5 feet tall, and weighing in at 100 lbs or less. The Blanche Barrow character seems about right here-- as the real Blanche was 5' 1" and about 90 lbs when captured. She and Bonnie were known to be able wear each others clothes.
Now does it matter, to have an historically accurate Bonnie & Clyde movie at some point?? "Of course" it does. To quote James Taylor, but expanded to include truth in Bonnie & Clyde History-- "That's why I'm here". However-- can movie makers overcome the pressures of $$, with all it's greed-driven baggage and perceived need for sensationalism to produce a greater return on investment-- and instead, satisfy those of us who care about history?? Apparently not. But "Hey movie makers!!!-- you know what"?? The real story of Bonnie & Clyde, is far more interesting than the fictionalized versions you wheel out there for a quick buck. Concerning an ultimate Bonnie & Clyde film, I was routing for Tonya Holly's effort-- which I hope somehow will be revived. But it seems when funding is involved (and it always is)-- creative license is retained by those expecting large returns on their investment. An unfortunate "truth"-- for those seeking and respecting the word.
So what's the verdict?? To me, all in all-- an entertaining 4 hours of "non-history"-- which to do it right, would likely take another 4 hours within a TV format. So enjoy this B&C effort for what it is-- as it has no way of being anything else.
Now was the real Bonnie Parker as conniving and aggressive as her TV counterpart?? Despite some wanting to believe she was the ultimate sweetheart-- eyewitness accounts had her cursing like a sailor, being threatening, drinking to excess, resorting to powerful pain-killing drugs (after being seriously injured at Wellington), and without much doubt-- having fired weapons at the law on a number of occasions. That said-- perhaps her portrayal here isn't that far from the truth. Now whether the real Bonnie ever had an inkling to settle for fame as a criminal within a gang responsible for at least 12 killings, rather than as a performer-- I don't believe can be discerned based on what is known of the real lady.
Certainly, Bonnie (who was known to be quite intelligent)-- knew that once she and the boys were sought for murder-- most any aspirations she had of a legitimate career in show business were through. So this movie hits on an aspect of Bonnie rarely considered. Bonnie "was" though-- surely stubborn, and loyal to her man to the end. And in this version sexually promiscuous, just as rumored after her death. However, in having dealt with Bonnie & Clyde sexual rumors for years now-- my feeling is, when someone shows me concrete evidence to back claims which eclipse the dealings of a normal sexually active young couple-- I'll consider it. Until then-- objectively, claims of nymphomania in Bonnie and homosexuality in Clyde seem unfounded. However years later, Dr. James Wade revealed that when killed-- both Bonnie & Clyde had had gonorrhea. So "go figure" the possibilities.
Some may be surprised to hear me say, that despite my being a Bonnie & Clyde purist-- and despite my choosing not to even attempt a count of historical inaccuracies this new Bonnie & Clyde film presents-- I must admit to liking this fantasized version to a certain degree, for the "entertainment" it is. I must say a truly different twist on Bonnie & Clyde-- much fun but historically inept. The casting for the most part is strong. Both the Clyde and Bonnie actors (as they "were" mostly known at the time)-- are terrific. And I especially like the Emma Parker, Cumie Barrow and Henry Barrow portrayals. I will say though, in knowing L. J. "Boots" Hinton as I do-- I wouldn't want to be in the room, when someone tells him his father Ted is seen coming on to Bonnie in asking for a kiss. But in all fairness, there are rumors concerning Ted's attraction to Bonnie-- some of which Ted caused himself. But that too you see-- is one of this history's many unknowns.
The conspicuous absence of W. D. Jones, materially changed a number of B&C occurrences. The mixed up way events were combined and placed out of order, is surely perplexing to those of us who know the correct order of things. For example, I didn't know Frank Hamer was hot on their trail at Dexter, Iowa and made the fatal shot which felled Buck months before the Eastham breakout. Now "that's" some creative combining of characters and events!! Nothing like pressing so much wrong into so little space. I do give the writers credit for knowing of Bonnie's use of Amytal. If they had only added Morphine to the mix, they would've had a much different Bonnie prior to Eastham. BTW-- Clyde was thought to have an effective "6th sense" which kept them out of trouble. It was Bonnie who had premonitions, as she did concerning the deaths of Billie's children.
And no matter the B&C version-- it must be really hard to find an actress who looks roughly like Bonnie and is the same size. The Clyde Barrow portrayal here seems right, as Clyde was 5' 6". Bonnie on the other hand, was a diminutive woman-- just under 5 feet tall, and weighing in at 100 lbs or less. The Blanche Barrow character seems about right here-- as the real Blanche was 5' 1" and about 90 lbs when captured. She and Bonnie were known to be able wear each others clothes.
Now does it matter, to have an historically accurate Bonnie & Clyde movie at some point?? "Of course" it does. To quote James Taylor, but expanded to include truth in Bonnie & Clyde History-- "That's why I'm here". However-- can movie makers overcome the pressures of $$, with all it's greed-driven baggage and perceived need for sensationalism to produce a greater return on investment-- and instead, satisfy those of us who care about history?? Apparently not. But "Hey movie makers!!!-- you know what"?? The real story of Bonnie & Clyde, is far more interesting than the fictionalized versions you wheel out there for a quick buck. Concerning an ultimate Bonnie & Clyde film, I was routing for Tonya Holly's effort-- which I hope somehow will be revived. But it seems when funding is involved (and it always is)-- creative license is retained by those expecting large returns on their investment. An unfortunate "truth"-- for those seeking and respecting the word.
So what's the verdict?? To me, all in all-- an entertaining 4 hours of "non-history"-- which to do it right, would likely take another 4 hours within a TV format. So enjoy this B&C effort for what it is-- as it has no way of being anything else.
